Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 13:23

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Europe stock markets open lower; FTSE 100 choppy after UK economy shrinks more than expected - CNBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump administration eyes stripping Columbia's accreditation - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Crypto Bros Celebrate Themselves at Bitcoin’s Most MAGA Convention Yet - Rolling Stone
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
PS5's Brilliant New State of Play Breaks Records for Sony - Push Square
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Selena Gomez Looks Unrecognizable With a Dramatic Retro Hair Transformation - instyle.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What's a memory from your childhood that shaped who you are today?